![dick cheney funny torque freedom planet dick cheney funny torque freedom planet](https://pm1.narvii.com/7856/7a3ececfa09467cdf0271a4fd0495015a39c69b3r1-800-700v2_hq.jpg)
Everyone was impressed with the fact that we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had, but for the 146 Americans killed in action and for the families it wasn't a cheap war. It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq. And if the Kurds spin loose and join with Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. Part of eastern Iraq the Iranians would like to claim. Part of it the Syrians would like to have, the west. And if you take down the central government in Iraq, you could easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off. Once you got to Iraq and took it over and took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.
![dick cheney funny torque freedom planet dick cheney funny torque freedom planet](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mW9CciCemNw/maxresdefault.jpg)
There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. Because if we had gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone.August 1992, at the Discovery Institute in Seattle.Once we had rounded him up and gotten rid of his government, then the question is what do you put in its place? You know, you then have accepted the responsibility for governing Iraq. So I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq. And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is not very damned many.At the Washington Institute's Soref Symposium, Ap.And it's my view that the President got it right both times, that it would have been a mistake for us to get bogged down in the quagmire inside Iraq. I think it is also very important for him to know when not to commit U.S. forces withdrew? How many casualties should the United States accept in that effort to try to create clarity and stability in a situation that is inherently unstable? I think it is vitally important for a President to know when to use military force. What kind of government? Should it be a Sunni government or Shi'i government or a Kurdish government or Ba'athist regime? Or maybe we want to bring in some of the Islamic fundamentalists? How long would we have had to stay in Baghdad to keep that government in place? What would happen to the government once U.S. And once we'd done that and we'd gotten rid of Saddam Hussein and his government, then we'd have had to put another government in its place. I think if we we're going to remove Saddam Hussein we would have had to go all the way to Baghdad, we would have to commit a lot of force because I do not believe he would wait in the Presidential Palace for us to arrive. I think that the proposition of going to Baghdad is also fallacious.Remarks after introducing a legislation to create a new import tax that would have caused the price of oil to soar by billions of dollars per year October 1986.Let us rid ourselves of the fiction that low oil prices are somehow good for the United States.Remarks during the 1976 US Presidential.Principle is okay up to a certain point, but principle doesn't do any good if you lose.